Democrat Sen. Alex Padilla Warns JCPA ‘Plagued by Vague Terms’

Democratic Sen. Alex Padilla (D-CA) raised further concerns about the Journalism Competition and Preservation Act (JCPA) at a hearing Thursday after Sen Ted Cruz (R-TX) caved in to left-wing legislation that would allow media organizations to form cartels to negotiate with big tech companies.

Padilla, on Thursday Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, told members he supported the bill’s “stated goal” but still had it To ponder. While he said he believes there needs to be “stronger language to ensure the proceeds from this bill go to the workers who make journalism possible and are invested in quality local journalism,” he contradicted his statements Colleagues. who suggested that the bill “is not about content moderation.”

“I don’t say that often. But Senator Cruz was rightly concerned about the impact of this bill on how information is shared and consumed online,” the Democrat admitted.

“But we deviate significantly from how the problems manifest themselves from this bill. And while it’s great that this committee has spent the last two weeks making sure Senator Cruz is happy with the bill, my strong concerns go unspoken,” Padilla said, essentially complaining that the measure didn’t go far enough to allow what he calls “bad faith actors” to continue, claiming that the provisions “force platforms to increase the spread of hate speech and disinformation online.”

And indeed, as Breitbart News reports, the bill exacerbates the problem of censorship. While these newly formed media cartels will not be able to exclude media companies based on “views expressed through their content,” they will still be able to exclude them based on arbitrary factors already used by the far left and big tech to censor conservatives who subjectively view their posts as “misinformation” or “extremism” or “hate speech” when they disagree with the narrative.

But Padilla clearly thinks the bill doesn’t allow for enough censorship. “These provisions also work together to allow malicious actors to coerce platforms to increase the spread of hate speech and disinformation online,” Padilla explained, also raising concerns about “the impact of the bill on the open internet and the ability of the public to access and share information.”

“The bill is plagued by vague terms,” ​​he continued, explaining that it “defines content access as ‘capturing, crawling and indexing content,’ but does not define these key terms. Does “acquiring” refer to a deliberate action by a platform, or does it include any instance of a video or content uploaded to a platform by a user?” he asked, expressing concern that the bill would harm organizations like Project Veritas and InfoWars would benefit.

“In other words, does a platform like YouTube, for example, acquire content when a user uploads a video to their service? If the answer is yes, then this bill creates an opportunity for outlets like Project Veritas or InfoWars to simply upload their videos to YouTube and then force payment from the company through the platform,” he said.

“Confusion over the interpretation of these highly technical terms can be extremely momentous,” Padilla added, concluding that the measure “requires a lot of work.”

As currently drafted, Padilla said he could not support the bill. However, the committee accepted Cruz’s amendment and requested the measure. Democrat Sen. Alex Padilla Warns JCPA ‘Plagued by Vague Terms’

Linh is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Related Articles

Back to top button