Megyn Kelly kicks off ‘devil theme’ at Grammy performance and cheers for Sam Smith for nipple covers

Megyn Kelly offered on her SiriusXM radio show Monday to turn down “non-binary” singer Sam Smith’s Grammys performance.

The presenter was particularly critical of the nipple covers the British singer showed off in one of his latest music videos, astutely pointing out that they were entirely unnecessary.

Kelly not only analyzed Smith’s performance of a song he dubbed “Unholy,” but she offered an assessment of whether it was a deliberate celebration of Satanism or simply a misguided gag.

She interviewed former Navy SEAL Rob O’Neill, and the pair spoke about the accomplishment and the music industry’s apparent disdain for Christianity.

The conversation would be humorous if its subject weren’t such a tragic sign of where the country stands both culturally and spiritually.

WARNING: The following video contains scenes that some viewers may find offensive.

“[Smith] went out and did this whole devilish act to celebrate Satan,” Kelly said. “Halfway through the song he added a horned hat to his look. And then of course the whole thing ends, as if on cue, and it has the banner ‘sponsored by Pfizer’.”

Kelly said she thinks the portrayal is more about mocking conservatives and Christians than worshiping Satan.

“It’s really an amazing right wing troll,” Kelly told O’Neill, noting that if that was indeed all the gimmick worked.

O’Neill agreed with Kelly.

“I think Sam Smith is trolling the right thing, I really am,” he said. “Because we say they’re all demons, that’s a demonic thing… and I mean Sam Smith loves it. He’s been out of the limelight for a while and I mean based on the nipple tassels in his latest video I think he likes attention.”

That prompted Kelly to point out the obvious.

“First of all, if you’re a man, you don’t need nipple covers,” she said. “What do you do with nipple covers? There’s nothing coming out of that nipple that you need to cover. OK? So take them off.”

The host concluded that Smith’s stunt at the Grammys was a “middle finger for Christians” more than anything else.

While Kelly probably has a point, the performance was an insult to God. Smith and those who praised his licentious performance eventually snubbed the Almighty and all those who seek to live in grace.

Ratings for this year’s Grammys were low, so at least relatively few people got to see Smith’s anti-Christian performance live.